West v. State

4 So. 3d 34, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1007, 2009 WL 290511
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in West v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 935 So. 2d 123
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 9, 2009·No. No. 1D07-1305·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges her conviction for leaving the scene of an accident with death. She correctly argues that the trial court erred by permitting the state to call a relative of the deceased victim at trial to identify the victim, where the state failed to show that it made an effort to find an unrelated witness capable of making the identification. See Thompson v. State, 565 So.2d 1311 (Fla.1990). Because we are unable to say beyond a reasonable doubt that this error did not affect the jury’s verdict, the appellant’s conviction is reversed and this case is remanded.

ALLEN, VAN NORTWICK, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

West v. State, 4 So. 3d 34, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1007, 2009 WL 290511 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

4 So. 3d 34 (West v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thompson v. State
565 So. 2d 1311 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)