West v. State

809 So. 2d 84, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2014, 2002 WL 265865
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in West v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 790 So. 2d 513
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 26, 2002·No. No. 1D01-2767·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the trial court’s denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 post-conviction motion for an award of additional jail credit. Because the appellant’s motion did not contain an allegation that the trial court files and records demonstrated on their face an entitlement to the relief requested, we affirm the order under review. See State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998); Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

ALLEN, C.J., BENTON and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

West v. State, 809 So. 2d 84, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2014, 2002 WL 265865 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

809 So. 2d 84 (West v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. State
714 So. 2d 1167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
State v. Mancino
714 So. 2d 429 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)