West v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

West v. State

686 So. 2d 5, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 628, 1996 WL 39588

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 2, 1996

DocketNo. 94-04520

StatusPublished

This text of 686 So. 2d 5 (West v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

West v. State, 686 So. 2d 5, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 628, 1996 WL 39588 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Torris West challenges his convictions for two counts of armed robbery. We find no merit in his argument that a mistrial should have been granted based on improper comments by the prosecutor during closing argument. Therefore, we affirm his conviction without prejudice to raise his ineffective assistance of counsel claim in the appropriate proceeding.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Torris West challenges his convictions for two counts of armed robbery. We find no merit in his argument that a mistrial should have been granted based on improper comments by the prosecutor during closing argument. Therefore, we affirm his conviction without prejudice to raise his ineffective assistance of counsel claim in the appropriate proceeding.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

686 So. 2d 5, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 628, 1996 WL 39588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.