West v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

West v. State

686 So. 2d 5, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 628, 1996 WL 39588

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in West v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 718 So. 2d 908 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 2, 1996·No. No. 94-04520·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Torris West challenges his convictions for two counts of armed robbery. We find no merit in his argument that a mistrial should have been granted based on improper comments by the prosecutor during closing argument. Therefore, we affirm his conviction without prejudice to raise his ineffective assistance of counsel claim in the appropriate proceeding.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Torris West challenges his convictions for two counts of armed robbery. We find no merit in his argument that a mistrial should have been granted based on improper comments by the prosecutor during closing argument. Therefore, we affirm his conviction without prejudice to raise his ineffective assistance of counsel claim in the appropriate proceeding.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

West v. State, 686 So. 2d 5, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 628, 1996 WL 39588 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

686 So. 2d 5 (West v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.