West v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

West v. State

117 So. 927, 22 Ala. App. 697

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 5, 1928

Docket7 Div. 451.

StatusPublished

This text of 117 So. 927 (West v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

West v. State, 117 So. 927, 22 Ala. App. 697 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The offense, charged by indictment, was “abusive language.” The indictment was in proper form and substance. The trial was had in the circuit court without a jury. The court assessed a fine of $50 and added 3 months at hard labor for the county. From the judgment of conviction, pronounced and entered, this appeal was taken. No error appears; said judgment is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

The offense, charged by indictment, was “abusive language.” The indictment was in proper form and substance. The trial was had in the circuit court without a jury. The court assessed a fine of $50 and added 3 months at hard labor for the county. From the judgment of conviction, pronounced and entered, this appeal was taken. No error appears; said judgment is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 So. 927, 22 Ala. App. 697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-v-state-alactapp-1928.