West v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

West v. State

117 So. 927, 22 Ala. App. 697

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in West v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 22 Ala. App. 187 →

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 5, 1928·No. 7 Div. 451.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The offense, charged by indictment, was “abusive language.” The indictment was in proper form and substance. The trial was had in the circuit court without a jury. The court assessed a fine of $50 and added 3 months at hard labor for the county. From the judgment of conviction, pronounced and entered, this appeal was taken. No error appears; said judgment is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

The offense, charged by indictment, was “abusive language.” The indictment was in proper form and substance. The trial was had in the circuit court without a jury. The court assessed a fine of $50 and added 3 months at hard labor for the county. From the judgment of conviction, pronounced and entered, this appeal was taken. No error appears; said judgment is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.

West v. State, 117 So. 927, 22 Ala. App. 697 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

117 So. 927 (West v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.