West v. State

104 So. 927, 20 Ala. App. 701
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 26, 1925
Docket7 Div. 113.
StatusPublished

This text of 104 So. 927 (West v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
West v. State, 104 So. 927, 20 Ala. App. 701 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The defendant was indicted, tried, and convicted for unlawfully possessing prohibited liquors. On this appeal the only insistence of error is that the state failed to meet the required burden of proof. Upon the trial of the case no exceptions were reserved, and the evidence was without conflict, as only two witnesses were examined by the state, and no testimony was offered by the defendant. The two state witnesses testified to sufficient facts to warrant the verdict and sustain the judgment, if their testimony was worthy of belief, and nothing appears to the contrary. The insistence of error by counsel for appellant cannot he sustained. Let the judgment of conviction appealed from stand affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 So. 927, 20 Ala. App. 701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-v-state-alactapp-1925.