West v. Smith
This text of 2 N.J. Eq. 309 (West v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The injunction must be dissolved, The complainant has not proceeded with his suit as he ought to have •done. A subpoena in chancery need not necessarily be served by a sheriff or coroner. It may be served by any other competent person ; but in such case there must be an affidavit of the manner and time of service, and upon the return.of the writ a rule must be taken upon the defendant to plead, answer or demur at or before -the next, stated term of the court. It is certainly proper, in all ordinary cases, that the process of the court should be served by the sheriff or-other officer known to the law, but the court has repeatedly sanctioned the service of its process by a private person.
See dase of Corey v. Voorhies et al., ante, page 5.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 N.J. Eq. 309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-v-smith-njch-1840.