West v. Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia

West v. Smith

3 S.E.2d 725, 188 Ga. 253, 1939 Ga. LEXIS 523

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJune 15, 1939

DocketNo. 12835

StatusPublished

This text of 3 S.E.2d 725 (West v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

West v. Smith, 3 S.E.2d 725, 188 Ga. 253, 1939 Ga. LEXIS 523 (Ga. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Gkice, Justice.

The municipal ordinance here involved was under attack in Watkins v. Simmons, 179 Ga. 162 (175 S. E. 493), and was sustained. The soundness of that decision is approved, and is unaffected by the fact that since its rendition the sale of intoxicants has become legal in the territory covered by the ordinance. Applying the ruling there made, the judgment in the instant case is

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Thomcts A. Jacobs Jr., for plaintiff. E. W. Maynard and J. E. Hall Jr., for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gkice, Justice.

The municipal ordinance here involved was under attack in Watkins v. Simmons, 179 Ga. 162 (175 S. E. 493), and was sustained. The soundness of that decision is approved, and is unaffected by the fact that since its rendition the sale of intoxicants has become legal in the territory covered by the ordinance. Applying the ruling there made, the judgment in the instant case is

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Thomcts A. Jacobs Jr., for plaintiff. E. W. Maynard and J. E. Hall Jr., for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 S.E.2d 725, 188 Ga. 253, 1939 Ga. LEXIS 523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-v-smith-ga-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack