West v. Schmieder

217 A.D.2d 579, 628 N.Y.S.2d 816
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 10, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 217 A.D.2d 579 (West v. Schmieder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
West v. Schmieder, 217 A.D.2d 579, 628 N.Y.S.2d 816 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

In a hybrid action and proceeding, inter alia, for judicial dissolution of a corporation, Marion West appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), entered August 6, 1993, which denied her motion to dismiss her former counsel’s application for an award of counsel fees based on his failure to timely enter a judgment on a decision awarding him counsel fees, and (2) an order of the same court, dated July 19, 1994, which denied her motion to (a) enjoin former counsel Vincent O’Connor from taking any action to enforce a judgment entered March 11, 1994, entered in his favor and against her in the principal sum of $19,902 for counsel fees, and (b) resettle that judgment.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the appellant’s motion to dismiss her former attorney’s application for counsel fees. The motion was based on the claim that counsel had abandoned his application by failing to timely submit a judgment for signature within 60 days after the signing and filing of the court’s decision awarding him counsel fees (see, Uniform Rules for Trial Cts [22 NYCRR] § 202.48 [a]). The appellant failed to establish, however, that the 1991 Supreme Court decision was ever filed.

We further find that the grave illnesses suffered by counsel and his wife constituted good cause for his delay in submitting the judgment for signature after both the initial decision and the order entered August 6, 1993 (see, Uniform Rules for Trial Cts [22 NYCRR] § 202.48 [b]). Balletta, J. P., Thompson, Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bove v. Bove
2020 NY Slip Op 07531 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
217 A.D.2d 579, 628 N.Y.S.2d 816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-v-schmieder-nyappdiv-1995.