West v. Rodahan

46 Ga. 553
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 15, 1872
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 46 Ga. 553 (West v. Rodahan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
West v. Rodahan, 46 Ga. 553 (Ga. 1872).

Opinion

Montgomery, Judge.

The bill in this case is saturated with specific charges of fraud on the part of the defendants. If true, as we must assume on demurrer, certainly there is no want of equity in the bill. The defendants can take nothing from the statement in the bill that they have been in possession for more than seven years, under adverse claim of title, the bill charging, as it does, that such adverse possession originated in fraud, of which the defendants were fully apprised at the time they went into possession: Code, section 2641. What the defendants may set up, by way of answer, we do not know. Certainly the bill is not demurrable for want of equity, or because it shows on its face a complete presci’iptive title, by the statute of limitations in the defendants.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thomas v. Couch
156 S.E. 206 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 Ga. 553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-v-rodahan-ga-1872.