West v. Roberts

135 F. 350, 68 C.C.A. 58, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4333
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 15, 1905
DocketNo. 1,366
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 135 F. 350 (West v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
West v. Roberts, 135 F. 350, 68 C.C.A. 58, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4333 (5th Cir. 1905).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the trial in the lower court each party requested the court to instruct the jury to return a verdict in his favor, and thereby each affirmed there was no disputed question of fact which could operate to deflect or control the question of law. See Beuttell v. Magone, 157 U. S. 157, 15 Sup. Ct. 566, 39 L. Ed. 654. The trial judge gave the peremptory instruction in favor of the defendant, and therein followed McDade v. The Bossier Levee Board, 109 Ra. 627, 33 South. 628, and Hall v. Revee Board, 111 Ra. 913, 35 South. 976.

The ruling of the trial judge was correct, and the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tyson-Long Co. v. Wolfe
81 F.2d 82 (Seventh Circuit, 1935)
De Burg v. Armenta
164 P. 838 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1917)
Lawton v. Carpenter
195 F. 362 (Fourth Circuit, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 F. 350, 68 C.C.A. 58, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-v-roberts-ca5-1905.