West v. Reavis
This text of 13 Ind. 294 (West v. Reavis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Suit to set aside the final settlement of an administrator, for fraud.
Demurrer to the complaint sustained, and the suit dismissed.
The suit was by creditors of the deceased intestate.
The fraud charged was in returning a false inventory.
Those who colluded with the administrator in returning the false inventory, and reaped the advantage of it, and the use of the property omitted to be inventoried, were made parties. See Roy v. Haviland, 12 Ind. R. 364.
The code authorizes a final settlement to be set aside for fraud, on the application of any one interested. 2 R. S. p. 275, § 116. We think fraud in the inventory may affect the final settlement with fraud, and will cause it to be set aside.
The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 Ind. 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-v-reavis-ind-1859.