West v. PRINT PACK, INC.

320 S.W.3d 722, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1264, 2010 WL 3637494
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 21, 2010·No. ED 94503·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Myron West (“Employee”) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“the Commission”) dismissing Employee’s claims for failure to prosecute. Employee contends there was not sufficient competent and substantial evidence to support the Commission’s decision and the decision was contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the *723 reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

West v. PRINT PACK, INC., 320 S.W.3d 722, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1264, 2010 WL 3637494 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

320 S.W.3d 722 (West v. PRINT PACK, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.