West v. PORT OF OLYMPIA
This text of 206 P.3d 657 (West v. PORT OF OLYMPIA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Arthur S. WEST, Petitioner, and
David Koenig, Plaintiff, and
Walter R. Jorgensen, an individual, and Eve Johnson, an individual, Respondents,
v.
PORT OF OLYMPIA, a Washington municipal corporation, Respondent, and
Weyerhaeuser Company, a Washington corporation Respondent.
Supreme Court of Washington.
ORDER
¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Alexander and Justices Madsen, Chambers, Fairhurst and Stephens, at its April 28, 2009, Motion Calendar, considered whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is denied. The Petitioner's motion to file a supplemental brief and motion to strike the Port's response are denied. Respondent Jorgensen/Johnson's motion to strike West's reply in support of petition for review, motion to strike West's second reply/response and the request for RAP 18.1(j) attorney fees are denied. Respondent Jorgensen's request for RAP 18.9(a) attorney fees is granted.
For the Court
/s/ Gerry L. Alexander CHIEF JUSTICEFree access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
206 P.3d 657, 165 Wash. 2d 1050, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-v-port-of-olympia-wash-2009.