West v. Platt

116 Mass. 308, 1874 Mass. LEXIS 92
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 20, 1874·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

The answer of the trustees admits that they were indebted to a firm of Platt & Boyd. Boyd was correctly named in the writ, and the error in Platt’s Christian name was cured by the amendment. The payment by the trustees, after service of the writ, and before the amendment, to the principal defendant, taking a bond of indemnity from him, did not alter their condition. Judgment against the trustees will protect them against any claim of the defendant. No other party having acquired intervening rights, by attachment or otherwise, the trustees were properly charged in the court below. Gen. Sts. c. 142, § 37. Vermilyea v. Roberts, 103 Mass. 410.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

West v. Platt, 116 Mass. 308, 1874 Mass. LEXIS 92 (Mass. 1874).

116 Mass. 308 (West v. Platt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brady v. Lichter
102 N.E.2d 402 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1951)
Grant v. Wentzell
2 Mass. App. Div. 354 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1937)
Connelly v. Dionne Trucking, Inc.
128 N.E. 719 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1920)
Sullivan v. Langley
128 Mass. 235 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1880)
Terry v. Sisson
125 Mass. 560 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1878)