West v. Housing Authority
This text of 227 S.E.2d 328 (West v. Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a condemnation proceeding brought by the Housing Authority of the City of Atlanta, the special master determined that the owner of the property in issue was E. Z. E., Inc., and that Thomas B. West had no valid claim to the land. The superior court denied West’s exceptions to the final report and award of the special master, and adopted the report as the judgment of the court. West appeals.
1. The special master did not err in admitting a certified copy of the recorded warranty deed to E. Z. E., Inc. Code Ann. § 38-641.
2. The special master did not err in finding that both fi. fas. were in personam rather than in rem. See Patterson v. Fla. Realty &c. Corp., 212 Ga. 440 (93 SE2d 571.) (1956).
3. The special master did not err in finding that the tax deed was not admissible as a muniment of title that ripened by prescription after seven years into fee simple title. Code Ann. § 92-8315 requires a "tax deed regularly executed at a valid and legal sale.”
4. Since the special master properly found that the levies upon the tax fi. fas. were void as to E. Z. E., Inc., we need not determine whether the description of the property in the tax fi. fas. and the levies was sufficient nor whether the notice of redemption published in the Fulton County Daily Report should have been considered.
5. The special master did not err in finding that E. Z. E., Inc., owned the property and that West had no title or ownership.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
227 S.E.2d 328, 237 Ga. 200, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 1197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-v-housing-authority-ga-1976.