West v. Harris

104 A.D.2d 686, 479 N.Y.S.2d 388, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20099

Opinion

— Application, pursuant to CPLR article 78, for judgment in the nature of prohibition, denied, and petition dated August 24, 1984 dismissed.

Initially, since petitioner seeks to review a claim of double jeopardy, this proceeding lies (see Matter of Di Lorenzo v Murtagh, 36 NY2d 306). However, since defendant’s judgment of conviction of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree was reversed by the Court of Appeals and the matter remitted for a new trial (People v West, 62 NY2d 708), petitioner is not entitled to the relief sought (CPL 40.30, subd 3; People v Ercole, 4 NY2d 617). Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Main, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

West v. Harris, 104 A.D.2d 686, 479 N.Y.S.2d 388, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20099 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

104 A.D.2d 686 (West v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ercole
152 N.E.2d 77 (New York Court of Appeals, 1958)
Di Lorenzo v. Murtagh
327 N.E.2d 805 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. West
465 N.E.2d 37 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)