West v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad

34 Mo. 177
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided October 15, 1863·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Dryden, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case the judgment must be reversed for the want. of a statement of sufficient facts in the petition to constitute a cause of action. The suit is for the killing of a cow of the defendant in error, by means of the locomotive and cars of the plaintiff in error, while running on its road. The pleader attempted to' frame his petition on the fifth section of the act concerning damages, but failed to aver, as it was necessary to do in order to show a cause of action under that section, that the act complained of did not occur on any portion of the road enclosed by a lawful fence, or in the crossing of a public highway. The averement of these facts is equivalent to the averment of negligence or wilfulness, but in this case the petition fails in both. Let the judgment be reversed and the cause remanded ;

the other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

West v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad, 34 Mo. 177 (Mo. 1863).

34 Mo. 177 (West v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Glenn v. Weary
66 Mo. App. 75 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1896)
Iba v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad
45 Mo. 469 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1870)