West v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad

34 Mo. 177
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedOctober 15, 1863
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 34 Mo. 177 (West v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
West v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad, 34 Mo. 177 (Mo. 1863).

Opinion

Dryden, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case the judgment must be reversed for the want. of a statement of sufficient facts in the petition to constitute a cause of action. The suit is for the killing of a cow of the defendant in error, by means of the locomotive and cars of the plaintiff in error, while running on its road. The pleader attempted to' frame his petition on the fifth section of the act concerning damages, but failed to aver, as it was necessary to do in order to show a cause of action under that section, that the act complained of did not occur on any portion of the road enclosed by a lawful fence, or in the crossing of a public highway. The averement of these facts is equivalent to the averment of negligence or wilfulness, but in this case the petition fails in both. Let the judgment be reversed and the cause remanded ;

the other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Glenn v. Weary
66 Mo. App. 75 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1896)
Iba v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad
45 Mo. 469 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1870)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 Mo. 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-v-hannibal-st-joseph-railroad-mo-1863.