West v. Galloway's Adm'r

Supreme Court of Alabama

West v. Galloway's Adm'r

33 Ala. 306

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJune 15, 1858

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 33 Ala. 306 (West v. Galloway's Adm'r) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

West v. Galloway's Adm'r, 33 Ala. 306 (Ala. 1858).

Pincite

Opinion

STONE, J.—

In considering the motion to enter judgment nunc pro tunc, the primary court should have regarded only the record evidence.—Thompson v. Miller, 2 Stew. 470.

The evidence adduced was record evidence, and it authorized the correction of the judgment nunc pro nunc. Thompson v. Miller, supra; Brown v. Bartlett, 2 Ala. 29; Spence v. Rutledge, 11 Ala. 590,

The judgment being regular, and that judgment relating back to the time it was first rendered, it must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STONE, J.—

In considering the motion to enter judgment nunc pro tunc, the primary court should have regarded only the record evidence.—Thompson v. Miller, 2 Stew. 470.

The evidence adduced was record evidence, and it authorized the correction of the judgment nunc pro nunc. Thompson v. Miller, supra; Brown v. Bartlett, 2 Ala. 29; Spence v. Rutledge, 11 Ala. 590,

The judgment being regular, and that judgment relating back to the time it was first rendered, it must be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 Ala. 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-v-galloways-admr-ala-1858.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack