West v. Galloway's Adm'r

33 Ala. 306
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 15, 1858·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

STONE, J.—

In considering the motion to enter judgment nunc pro tunc, the primary court should have regarded only the record evidence.—Thompson v. Miller, 2 Stew. 470.

The evidence adduced was record evidence, and it authorized the correction of the judgment nunc pro nunc. Thompson v. Miller, supra; Brown v. Bartlett, 2 Ala. 29; Spence v. Rutledge, 11 Ala. 590,

The judgment being regular, and that judgment relating back to the time it was first rendered, it must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

West v. Galloway's Adm'r, 33 Ala. 306 (Ala. 1858).

33 Ala. 306 (West v. Galloway's Adm'r) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Independent Publishing Co. v. American Press Ass'n
102 Ala. 475 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1893)