West v. Dorsey

317 S.E.2d 669, 170 Ga. App. 215, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 1852
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in West v. Dorsey. Read the opinion of the Court — 167 Ga. App. 233
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 12, 1984·No. 65727·Published

Opinion

Birdsong, Judge.

The decision of this court at 167 Ga. App. 233 (305 SE2d 840), [216]*216having been reversed by the Supreme Court on certiorari, it is hereby ordered that the case be remanded and appropriate judgment be entered in favor of the appellees Dorsey for the amount paid by them on their indebtedness to West and forefeiture by West of all other principal and interest, as contemplated in West v. Dorsey, 248 Ga. 790 (285 SE2d 703). (See also Dorsey v. West, 161 Ga. App. 253 (289 SE2d 827)).

Decided March 12, 1984. Durwood T. Pye, for appellants. Michael C. Ford, for appellees.

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray, C. J., and Shulman, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

West v. Dorsey, 317 S.E.2d 669, 170 Ga. App. 215, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 1852 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984).

317 S.E.2d 669 (West v. Dorsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dorsey v. West
289 S.E.2d 827 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
West v. Dorsey
285 S.E.2d 703 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1982)
West v. Dorsey
305 S.E.2d 840 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)