West v. Doctor's Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

West v. Doctor's Hospital

198 A.D.2d 92, 603 N.Y.S.2d 842

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 16, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 198 A.D.2d 92 (West v. Doctor's Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

West v. Doctor's Hospital, 198 A.D.2d 92, 603 N.Y.S.2d 842 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Kristin Booth Glen, J.), entered April 9, 1992, which, inter alia, granted the cross motion of respondent to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to CPLR 308 (2) and 3211 (a) (8), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Personal service may be effected by delivery to a person of suitable age and discretion at a defendant’s actual place of business (CPLR 308 [2]). Although the invoices of defendant-respondent, an attending physician at defendant hospital, specified two business addresses, including an office at the hospital in room 847, service was improperly made upon a hospital administrator at the administration office on the fourteenth floor (see, Glosser v Keller, 149 Misc 2d 875). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Wallach, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Kristin Booth Glen, J.), entered April 9, 1992, which, inter alia, granted the cross motion of respondent to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to CPLR 308 (2) and 3211 (a) (8), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Personal service may be effected by delivery to a person of suitable age and discretion at a defendant’s actual place of business (CPLR 308 [2]). Although the invoices of defendant-respondent, an attending physician at defendant hospital, specified two business addresses, including an office at the hospital in room 847, service was improperly made upon a hospital administrator at the administration office on the fourteenth floor (see, Glosser v Keller, 149 Misc 2d 875). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Wallach, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 A.D.2d 92, 603 N.Y.S.2d 842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-v-doctors-hospital-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack