West v. Coppersmith

200 N.C. 798
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 18, 1931·Published

Opinion

Pee Oubiam.

There is neither finding nor evidence on tbe record sufficient to establish that tbe neglect of tbe defendants was legally excusable. Hence, tbe ruling must be upheld on authority of Sutherland v. McLean, 199 N. C., 345, and Pepper v. Clegg, 132 N. C., 312, 43 S. E., 906.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

West v. Coppersmith, 200 N.C. 798 (N.C. 1931).

200 N.C. 798 (West v. Coppersmith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pepper v. Clegg.
43 S.E. 906 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1903)
Sutherland v. McLean
199 N.C. 345 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)