West v. . Coppersmith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

West v. . Coppersmith

156 S.E. 927, 200 N.C. 798, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 449

DecidedFebruary 18, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 156 S.E. 927 (West v. . Coppersmith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

West v. . Coppersmith, 156 S.E. 927, 200 N.C. 798, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 449 (N.C. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion under C. S., 600, to set aside judgment by default and inquiry for excusable neglect. Motion denied. Defendants appeal. There is neither finding nor evidence on the record sufficient to establish that the neglect of the defendants was legally excusable. Hence, the ruling must be upheld on authority of Sutherland v. McLean,199 N.C. 345, and Pepper v. Clegg, 132 N.C. 312, 43 S.E. 906.

Affirmed. *Page 799

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion under C. S., 600, to set aside judgment by default and inquiry for excusable neglect. Motion denied. Defendants appeal. There is neither finding nor evidence on the record sufficient to establish that the neglect of the defendants was legally excusable. Hence, the ruling must be upheld on authority of Sutherland v. McLean,199 N.C. 345, and Pepper v. Clegg, 132 N.C. 312, 43 S.E. 906.

Affirmed. *Page 799

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

156 S.E. 927, 200 N.C. 798, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-v-coppersmith-nc-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack