West v. Commonwealth

438 A.2d 1012, 63 Pa. Commw. 350, 1981 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1987
CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 23, 1981
DocketAppeal, No. 1038 C.D. 1980
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 438 A.2d 1012 (West v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
West v. Commonwealth, 438 A.2d 1012, 63 Pa. Commw. 350, 1981 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1987 (Pa. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Palladino,

Elizabeth West appeals an order of the Department of Public Welfare (DPW) which affirmed the Philadelphia County Assistance Office’s (CAO) re-computation of food stamp benefits. We affirm.

[351]*351Based on additional employment income reported by West, tbe CAO recalculated her eligibility for benefits under both the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDO) and Food Stamp programs. West’s benefits (as a mother with two dependent children) under AFDO were reduced from $318.00 to $272.30 per month and her food stamp assistance was terminated.

West contends that the $172.50 allowed as a deduction by CAO for transportation and child care expenses in computing her AFDO payment, 55 Pa. Code §183.44(f) (1) (i) and (iv), should be considered, in practical effect a reimbursement for purposes of food stamp eligibility computation. If the $172.50 in deductions is considered to be a reimbursement, it would be excludible income for the purposes of calculating food stamp eligibility, 55 Pa. Code §523.3(c) (7) (i), (iii), and West would be eligible for food stamps.1

West’s contention is without merit. The food stamp provisions are clear: for purposes of calculating eligibility, AFDC payments are to be considered includible, unearned income, 55 Pa. Code §523.3 (b) (2) (i).

[352]*352If we accepted West’s argument, we would, in effect, be granting her a double payment for her transportation and child care expenses. These provisions were never intended to have such an effect.

Affirmed.

Order

And Now, December 23, 1981, the order of the Department of Public Welfare, Number 748511-0, dated April 2,1980, is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ondrusek v. Commonwealth
496 A.2d 70 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1985)
Kratzer v. Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare
481 A.2d 1380 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
438 A.2d 1012, 63 Pa. Commw. 350, 1981 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1987, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-v-commonwealth-pacommwct-1981.