West v. Broadwell
265 P. 783, 124 Or. 654, 1928 Ore. LEXIS 101
Opinion
This appeal is pending on motion to dismiss on the same ground as the companion case of the same title this day decided {ante, p. 652). The only difference is that this is an action to recover the possession of personal property while the other action' was to recover possession of real prop *655 erty. Both actions arose ont of the same contract between the parties litigant.
For the reasons assigned in the companion case the motion to dismiss is allowed.
Appeal Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
West v. Broadwell, 265 P. 783, 124 Or. 654, 1928 Ore. LEXIS 101 (Or. 1928).
265 P. 783 (West v. Broadwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gallagher v. Fire Insurance Exchange
980 S.W.2d 833 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)
In re the Marriage of Nickerson
666 P.2d 868 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1983)
Graf v. Don Rasmussen Co.
592 P.2d 250 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1979)
Hinckley v. Hinckley
295 P.2d 1105 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1956)
Commercial Service Corp. v. L. Paulle-Midway Fixture & Show Case Co.
66 N.W.2d 523 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1954)
Pacific General Contractors, Inc. v. Slate Construction Co.
251 P.2d 454 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1952)
Cottrell Et Ux. v. Prier Et Ux.
231 P.2d 788 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1951)
Bennell Realty Co. v. E. G. Shinner & Co., Inc.
87 F.2d 824 (Seventh Circuit, 1937)
Heider v. Unicume
20 P.2d 384 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1933)
Leonard v. Bonser
280 P. 340 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1929)