Home/Sixth Circuit/West v. Barth

West v. Barth

104 F. 1007, 43 C.C.A. 684, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1664
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedNovember 28, 1898
DocketNo. 662
StatusPublished

This text of 104 F. 1007 (West v. Barth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
West v. Barth, 104 F. 1007, 43 C.C.A. 684, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1664 (6th Cir. 1898).

Opinion

In Error to the Circuit Court of United States for the [1008]*1008Western District of Michigan.

George P. Wanty (Niram A. Fletcher, on the brief), for plaintiff in error. Willis B. Perkins (J. Byron Judkins, on the brief), for defendant in error.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 F. 1007, 43 C.C.A. 684, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-v-barth-ca6-1898.