West v. Bank of Americus
This text of 63 Ga. 230 (West v. Bank of Americus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was a motion to set aside the judgment on the ground that it did not follow the verdict. The verdict is for eighteen hundred dollars, written thus : “ eighteen 1800 dollars;” the judgment is for eighteen hundred dollars, written out in full. The pleadings show that the petition, rule nisi and absolute to foreclose the mortgage, were all for eighteen "hundred dollars.
Plaintiff in error contends that the word “eighteen” in writing, qualifies the following written word “dollars,” and that the verdict should be read leaving out the figures “1800.” On the other hand, the pleadings all show that eighteen hundred dollars was the sum sued for in the petition and rule, and it was right, we think, to read the verdict in an .ambiguous case in the light of the pleadings. [231]*231Besides, the certificate of the judge shows that there were ear-marks which could not be sent up by the clerk as part of the record, which assisted in his interpretation of the verdict. See 40 Ga., 249.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 Ga. 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-v-bank-of-americus-ga-1879.