West Side Bank v. Foehrenbach

City of New York Municipal Court

West Side Bank v. Foehrenbach

27 Misc. 815, 57 N.Y.S. 396

DecidedMarch 15, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 27 Misc. 815 (West Side Bank v. Foehrenbach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

West Side Bank v. Foehrenbach, 27 Misc. 815, 57 N.Y.S. 396 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Orders affirmed, with costs. The order appointing Mr. Hyatt receiver, was made after due notice to the judgment debtor and other judgment creditors having proceedings pending. The only right which the Pennsylvania Class Company had after the appointment of such receiver was to have such receivership extended so as to protect its interests.

It was, therefore, proper for the Special Term justice to deny its motion to vacate such receivership.

Present: Eitzsimons, Ch. J.; Conlan and,Schttchman, JJ..

Orders affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Orders affirmed, with costs. The order appointing Mr. Hyatt receiver, was made after due notice to the judgment debtor and other judgment creditors having proceedings pending. The only right which the Pennsylvania Class Company had after the appointment of such receiver was to have such receivership extended so as to protect its interests.

It was, therefore, proper for the Special Term justice to deny its motion to vacate such receivership.

Present: Eitzsimons, Ch. J.; Conlan and,Schttchman, JJ..

Orders affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 Misc. 815, 57 N.Y.S. 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-side-bank-v-foehrenbach-nynyccityct-1899.