West Shore Railroad v. Wenner
60 A. 1134, 71 N.J.L. 682, 1905 N.J. LEXIS 168
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in West Shore Railroad v. Wenner. Read the opinion of the Court — 70 N.J.L. 233 →
Opinion
The questions of law involved in this case were all disposed of in the opinion of Mr. Justice Dixon when the case was formerly before us. 41 Vroom 233.
The evidence of King justified the finding of the trial judge that there was no consent to any assignment of the lease, or any sub-letting such as would prevent a forfeiture.
The judgment must therefore be affirmed.
[683]*683For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Eort, Garretson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert; Vre-DENBURGH, VROOM, GREEN. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
West Shore Railroad v. Wenner, 60 A. 1134, 71 N.J.L. 682, 1905 N.J. LEXIS 168 (N.J. 1905).
60 A. 1134 (West Shore Railroad v. Wenner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
West Shore Railroad v. Wenner
57 A. 408 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1904)