West Missouri Land Co. v. Thompson

57 S.W. 1042, 157 Mo. 647, 1900 Mo. LEXIS 52
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedJune 30, 1900
StatusPublished

This text of 57 S.W. 1042 (West Missouri Land Co. v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
West Missouri Land Co. v. Thompson, 57 S.W. 1042, 157 Mo. 647, 1900 Mo. LEXIS 52 (Mo. 1900).

Opinion

VALLIANT, J.

This is an action of ejectment for a strip of land lying on the south bank: of the MissourLriver within the corporate limits of Kansas City. The petition is in the usual form and the answer is a general denial. The evidence showed paper title of record in the plaintiff. The defendant’s effort was to show title by adverse possession. The land in controversy is a small strip embraced within a considerable tract covered by the plaintiff’s deeds. This tract was owned by the West Kansas City Land Company, from whom or rather from whóse trustees plaintiff purchased. That company, while it owned the tract, platted upon a part of it an addition to Kansas City. There was a strip between the part platted and the river, which was not included in the plat. The following diagram was in evidence showing the part platted, and that unplatted, and showing the land in suit which is designated by heavy lines. (See next page.)

The evidence on the part of defendant tended to show that he moyed on lots” 9, 10 and 11 of the plat in 1877, and that at that time the river at high water washed against and under the K. C. & Ft. Scott railroad, shown on the plat, though at low water the river ran within its banks somewhat north of the railroad, that defendant began dumping earth and filling in at that point on those lots, and by that means and by the river deposits the land was made and extended out to where the river now is, as shown on the plat, and that defendant has all the while -been in possession, claiming it as his own.

[650]*650

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Benson v. Morrow
61 Mo. 345 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1875)
Naylor v. Cox
21 S.W. 589 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1893)
Cox v. Arnold
31 S.W. 592 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1895)
Perkins v. Adams
33 S.W. 778 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1896)
Hahn v. Dawson
36 S.W. 233 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1896)
McBaine v. Johnson
55 S.W. 1031 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1900)
Moore v. Farmer
56 S.W. 493 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 S.W. 1042, 157 Mo. 647, 1900 Mo. LEXIS 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-missouri-land-co-v-thompson-mo-1900.