West, Kevin Ktari
This text of West, Kevin Ktari (West, Kevin Ktari) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-93,970-01; WR-93,970-02; WR-93,970-03; & WR-93,970-04
EX PARTE KEVIN KTARI WEST, Applicant
ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. W19-40289-W(A), W19-40171-W(A), W19-40152-W(A), & W19-42140-W(A) IN THE 363RD DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant pleaded guilty to fraud and credit/debit card abuse, and he was placed on deferred
adjudication community supervision. After Applicant’s probation was revoked, he was adjudicated
guilty of these two offenses and was also convicted of two theft offenses. He was sentenced to three
years’ imprisonment for each offense, to run concurrently. Applicant did not appeal his convictions.
Applicant filed these applications for wrist of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the
district clerk forwarded them to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends that he was denied post-conviction time credit, specifically from the time
his sentences were imposed on Jan. 6, 2020 until his transfer to Texas Department of Criminal 2
Justice’s custody on Sept. 9, 2020. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to
relief. Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for
findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order the Texas
Department of Criminal Justice’s Office of the General Counsel to obtain a response from a person
with knowledge of relevant facts. The response shall state whether Applicant presented a claim to
the time credit resolution system of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (“TDCJ”) and, if so,
the date the claim was presented. In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out
in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether
Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court
shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC . art. 26.04. If
counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s
name.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether, before filing
this application, Applicant properly exhausted administrative remedies as required by § 501.0081(b)
of the Government Code. The trial court shall then determine whether Applicant is receiving the
proper credit for the time between when his sentences were imposed and when he was transferred
to TDCJ custody. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems
appropriate in response to Applicant’s claim.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from 3
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: June 8, 2022
Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
West, Kevin Ktari, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-kevin-ktari-texcrimapp-2022.