West Kentucky Coal Co. v. National Bituminous Coal Commission

Sixth Circuit

West Kentucky Coal Co. v. National Bituminous Coal Commission

106 F.2d 1022, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 3244

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedOctober 11, 1939

DocketNo. 8380

StatusPublished

This text of 106 F.2d 1022 (West Kentucky Coal Co. v. National Bituminous Coal Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

West Kentucky Coal Co. v. National Bituminous Coal Commission, 106 F.2d 1022, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 3244 (6th Cir. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on this the 11th day of October, 1939, and it appearing to the court that a stipulation between the West Kentucky Coal Company, petitioner, and Harold L. Ickes, Secretary of the Department of the Interior of the United States, and Howard A. Gray, Director of the Bituminous Coal Division of the Department of the Interior of the United States, as successors to the National Bituminous Coal Commission, respondents, has been entered into, and filed in this proceeding, by their attorneys of record, agreeing to the dismissal of the petition for review filed herein, it is therefore ordered, .adjudged, and decreed by the court that the petition for review herein be dismissed at petitioner’s cost for the reasons stated in the stipulation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on this the 11th day of October, 1939, and it appearing to the court that a stipulation between the West Kentucky Coal Company, petitioner, and Harold L. Ickes, Secretary of the Department of the Interior of the United States, and Howard A. Gray, Director of the Bituminous Coal Division of the Department of the Interior of the United States, as successors to the National Bituminous Coal Commission, respondents, has been entered into, and filed in this proceeding, by their attorneys of record, agreeing to the dismissal of the petition for review filed herein, it is therefore ordered, .adjudged, and decreed by the court that the petition for review herein be dismissed at petitioner’s cost for the reasons stated in the stipulation.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 F.2d 1022, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 3244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-kentucky-coal-co-v-national-bituminous-coal-commission-ca6-1939.