West Jersey Trust Co. v. Hayday

4 A.2d 280, 125 N.J. Eq. 90, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 629
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 6, 1939·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Sooy, and reported in 124 N. J. Eq. 85.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Eaeeerty, Walker, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

West Jersey Trust Co. v. Hayday, 4 A.2d 280, 125 N.J. Eq. 90, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 629 (N.J. 1939).

4 A.2d 280 (West Jersey Trust Co. v. Hayday) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Estate of Cook
206 A.2d 865 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1965)
President of the Manhattan Co. v. Armour
94 A.2d 286 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1953)
Rausch v. Libby
29 A.2d 378 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1942)