West Food Stores, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company

417 F.2d 1219, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10206
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedNovember 3, 1969
Docket17524_1
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 417 F.2d 1219 (West Food Stores, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
West Food Stores, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company, 417 F.2d 1219, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10206 (7th Cir. 1969).

Opinion

CASTLE, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action 1 on a policy of insurance issued by defendant which covered the personal property and inventory in plaintiff’s five food store locations and one warehouse against specific perils, including fire. Plaintiff claimed that the defendant was liable under the policy for the full amount of the loss, $43,676.05, plus $10,919.01 attorney’s fees for alleged vaxatious refusal to pay plaintiff’s demand. Defendant admitted liability only to the extent of $15,000, and paid that sum into the registry of the court. The district court, upon defendant’s motion, held that the plaintiff was entitled to recover only the $15,000, and plaintiff appealed.

The insurance policy in question is of the type known as a “provisional policy of insurance,” and differs from most casualty policies in that the coverage effective under the policy and the premiums payable for such coverage, varies from time to time in relation to, and never in excess of, the values of the property insured. Thus, a provisional premium is paid in advance and reports are made to the insurer each month which indicate the actual value of property on the insured premises. At the end of the *1220 accounting period, the final premium is adjusted to reflect the exact values which have been at risk during the period. 2

The policy issued to plaintiff by defendant contained the following clauses:

“II. LIMITS OF LIABILITY
Subject to the provisions with respect to this Company’s percentage of participation as indicated on the face of this policy, coverage under this form applies to each of the following locations for which a definite amount is specified as a limit and inserted in the blank immediately opposite the location item.
SCHEDULE OF LIMITS OF LIABILITY

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bahama Bay II Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. United Nat'l Ins. Co.
374 F. Supp. 3d 1274 (M.D. Florida, 2019)
Johnson v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America
809 F. Supp. 602 (N.D. Illinois, 1992)
Victory Container Corp. v. Sphere Insurance
448 F. Supp. 1043 (S.D. New York, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
417 F.2d 1219, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-food-stores-inc-v-hartford-fire-insurance-company-ca7-1969.