West Flagler Associates Ltd. v. Jackson

457 So. 2d 587, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2209, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15569
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 16, 1984·No. No. 83-2995·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment under review is affirmed upon a holding that the evidence presented below was sufficient to sustain a jury verdict for the plaintiff herein. The jury could have reasonably found on this evidence that the defendant failed to maintain its jai alai fronton business premises, a place of amusement where large crowds congregate, in a reasonably safe condition commensurate with the business conducted, which failure was a proximate cause of the plaintiffs injuries. Helman v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad, 349 So.2d 1187, 1189 (Fla.1977); Wells v. Palm Beach Kennel Club, 160 Fla. 502, 35 So.2d 720 (1948).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

West Flagler Associates Ltd. v. Jackson, 457 So. 2d 587, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2209, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15569 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

457 So. 2d 587 (West Flagler Associates Ltd. v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fazio v. Dania Jai-Alai Palace, Inc.
473 So. 2d 1345 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)