West Coast Lumber Co. v. Brady
This text of 137 P. 764 (West Coast Lumber Co. v. Brady) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The Circuit Court had no jurisdiction to allow a substitution of the copy of the amended complaint. It was the duty of the appellant to bring into the Circuit Court a perfect record. If portions of the record had been lost, it was the duty of the appellant to have applied to the Justice’s Court for leave to substitute copies before bringing up his transcript. Failing to [41]*41do this, the Circuit Court was without jurisdiction to hear the cause: Corbitt & Macleay v. Bauer, 10 Or. 340.
Plaintiff was in the Appellate Court without a complaint, and the action was properly dismissed.
The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
137 P. 764, 69 Or. 39, 1914 Ore. LEXIS 308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-coast-lumber-co-v-brady-or-1914.