West Chicago Street Railroad v. Marks

55 N.E. 67, 182 Ill. 15
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 25, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 55 N.E. 67 (West Chicago Street Railroad v. Marks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
West Chicago Street Railroad v. Marks, 55 N.E. 67, 182 Ill. 15 (Ill. 1899).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Phillips

delivered the opinion of the court:

It sufficiently appears from the allegations of the declaration that the plaintiff became a passenger on the defendant’s cars and the latter did not use proper care to see that the former should be carried safely; that it negligently ran its cars so near to a fixed structure that there was not room enough, unless standing very close to the car, when riding on the foot-board, to be carried in safety, and that the plaintiff did not know of the existence of the fixed structure and was not warned of it by the defendant, and whilst using due care and caution for his own safety was unavoidably struck and injured. We are of opinion that the declaration stated a cause of action.

The answer of the judge by giving an instruction to the jury in response to their communication was not error.

The jury had nothing to do with the relationship existing between the city of Chicago and the appellant with reference to the use of the viaduct, nor as to whether the tracks were situated, with reference to the obstruction, in the position they were by the direction of the municipality. That question was not involved in the case submitted to them under the issue, and it was not error for the court to so instruct them.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment of the Appellate Court for the-First District is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cunningham's Administrator v. Central Kentucky Traction Co.
160 S.W. 767 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1913)
Cameron v. Lewiston, Brunswick & Bath Street Railway
70 A. 534 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1908)
Tietz v. International Railway Co.
78 N.E. 1083 (New York Court of Appeals, 1906)
Anderson v. City Railway Co.
71 P. 659 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 N.E. 67, 182 Ill. 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-chicago-street-railroad-v-marks-ill-1899.