West Chicago St. R. Co. v. Dudzik

67 Ill. App. 681, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 202
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedJanuary 7, 1897
StatusPublished

This text of 67 Ill. App. 681 (West Chicago St. R. Co. v. Dudzik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
West Chicago St. R. Co. v. Dudzik, 67 Ill. App. 681, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 202 (Ill. Ct. App. 1897).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion oe the Court.

The court and- jury, before whom this cause was tried, having determined that appellee was, while in the exercise of ordinary care, injured by the negligence of appellant, this court can not set aside such finding upon the evidence, unless we can say that it is opposed to the clear preponderance thereof.

Appellee was hurt while endeavoring to take passage upon one of appellant’s cars. The car was' then moving slowly. To get on or off a moving street car is not necessarily a failure to exercise ordinary care. North Chicago St. Ry. Co. v. Wrixon, 51 Ill. App. 307.

There is nothing tending to show that the jury was actuated by passion or prejudice.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

North Chicago Street Railroad v. Wrixon
51 Ill. App. 307 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 Ill. App. 681, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-chicago-st-r-co-v-dudzik-illappct-1897.