Wesson v. Stephens

37 N.C. 559
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 15, 1843·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Daniel, J.

A delivery of a deed'to a third person, for the use of the grantee, makes it effectual from the intsant of such delivery, although the person is not the agent but a stranger to the grantee, provided the grantee assents to it, which in this case he did. Alford v Lee, Cro. Eliz. 54.— Garnons v Knight, Barn. &. C. 671. The witnesses do not prove directly that the deed contained a release clause of the purchase money, but they say that the deed was “in due form.” We must understand that it did contain such a release, and therefore that the plaintiff is entitled to the decree he prays.

Per CuRrAM. Decree accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wesson v. Stephens, 37 N.C. 559 (N.C. 1843).

37 N.C. 559 (Wesson v. Stephens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ballard v. Ballard
55 S.E.2d 316 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)