Wesson v. . Stephens

37 N.C. 557
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 5, 1843
StatusPublished

This text of 37 N.C. 557 (Wesson v. . Stephens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wesson v. . Stephens, 37 N.C. 557 (N.C. 1843).

Opinion

A delivery of a deed to a third person for the use of the grantee makes it effectual from the instant of such delivery, although the person is not the agent, but a stranger to the grantee, provided the grantee assents to it, which in this case he did. Alford v. Lee, Cro. Eliz., 54;Garnons v. Knight, Barn. C., 671. The witnesses do not prove directly that the deed contained a release clause of the purchase money, but they say that the deed was "in due form." We must understand that it did contain such a release, and therefore that the plaintiff is entitled to the decree he prays.

PER CURIAM. Decreed accordingly.

Cited: Pritchard v. Sanderson, 84 N.C. 303; Lawson v. Pringle,98 N.C. 452. *Page 413

(560)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pritchard v. . Sanderson
84 N.C. 299 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 N.C. 557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wesson-v-stephens-nc-1843.