Wesson v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Wesson v. State

667 So. 2d 708, 1995 Ala. LEXIS 337, 1995 WL 473494

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided August 11, 1995·No. 1940855·Published

Opinion

INGRAM, Justice.

After carefully reviewing the record, we quash the writ of certiorari as having been improvidently granted.

In quashing the writ, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and ALMON, HOUSTON, and BUTTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

INGRAM, Justice.

After carefully reviewing the record, we quash the writ of certiorari as having been improvidently granted.

In quashing the writ, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and ALMON, HOUSTON, and BUTTS, JJ., concur.

Wesson v. State, 667 So. 2d 708, 1995 Ala. LEXIS 337, 1995 WL 473494 (Ala. 1995).

Pincite

667 So. 2d 708 (Wesson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related