Wesson v. Dullzell
This text of 15 A.D.2d 744 (Wesson v. Dullzell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It appears without contradiction that the motion was denied on condition that plaintiff pay costs to date and that these costs were accepted and retained by defendants’ attorneys. Under these circumstances the right to appeal is waived and the appeal must be dismissed (James v. Ouimet, 283 App. Div. 819, and authorities cited therein). Motion to dismiss appeal dismissed, having become academic by virtue of the decision of this court decided herein. Concur — McNally, J. P., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bastow, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 A.D.2d 744, 223 N.Y.S.2d 876, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wesson-v-dullzell-nyappdiv-1962.