Wessels v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Wessels v. Superior Court

200 Cal. 403

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 10, 1927

DocketS. F. No. 12406

StatusPublished

This text of 200 Cal. 403 (Wessels v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wessels v. Superior Court, 200 Cal. 403 (Cal. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

THE

The application for a writ of prohibition herein is denied.

The remedy of the petitioner is to first present his defense upon the hearing of the contempt proceedings and [404]*404then, if found guilty of the contempt, to apply to a higher court for a writ of certiorari or habeas corpus. (Commercial Bank v. Superior Court, 192 Cal. 395, 397 [220 Pac. 422]; Drew v. Superior Court, 43 Cal. App. 651, 655 [185 Pac. 680].)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE

The application for a writ of prohibition herein is denied.

The remedy of the petitioner is to first present his defense upon the hearing of the contempt proceedings and [404]*404then, if found guilty of the contempt, to apply to a higher court for a writ of certiorari or habeas corpus. (Commercial Bank v. Superior Court, 192 Cal. 395, 397 [220 Pac. 422]; Drew v. Superior Court, 43 Cal. App. 651, 655 [185 Pac. 680].)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 Cal. 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wessels-v-superior-court-cal-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack