Wessels v. Superior Court
253 P. 135, 200 Cal. 403, 1927 Cal. LEXIS 555
California Supreme Court·Decided February 10, 1927·No. Docket No. S.F. 12406.·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
THE COURT.
The application for a writ of prohibition herein is denied.
The remedy of the petitioner is to first present his defense upon the hearing of the contempt proceedings and *Page 404
then, if found guilty of the contempt, to apply to a higher court for a writ of certiorari or habeas corpus. (Commercial Bank
v. Superior Court,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wessels v. Superior Court, 253 P. 135, 200 Cal. 403, 1927 Cal. LEXIS 555 (Cal. 1927).
253 P. 135 (Wessels v. Superior Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. Superior Court
171 P.2d 21 (California Supreme Court, 1946)
State Board of Equalization v. Superior Court
127 P.2d 4 (California Supreme Court, 1942)
C. S. Smith Metropolitan Market Co. v. Superior Court
105 P.2d 587 (California Supreme Court, 1940)
Monjar v. Superior Court
87 P.2d 694 (California Supreme Court, 1939)
Kabadian v. Doak
65 F.2d 202 (D.C. Circuit, 1933)
Phillips v. Superior Court
293 P. 661 (California Court of Appeal, 1930)
Weber v. Superior Court
292 P. 650 (California Court of Appeal, 1930)