Wessels v. Carr

6 N.Y.S. 535, 22 Abb. N. Cas. 464
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedApril 15, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 6 N.Y.S. 535 (Wessels v. Carr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wessels v. Carr, 6 N.Y.S. 535, 22 Abb. N. Cas. 464 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

Opinion

Nehrbas, J.

Every inquest taken in a cause is a trial, for which a trial fee may be taxed. The sum paid for the privilege of opening the inquest is in the nature of a penalty imposed, and does not interfere with the taxation of costs to the party ultimately successful. Cohn v. Husson, 3 How. Pr. (N. S.) 130. But the amount taxable for proceedings after granting of a new trial can scarcely be made applicable to the case of setting aside an inquest. The clerk’s taxation will, therefore, be affirmed, except as to the item of $50 for proceedings before and after granting two new trials, which item will be disallowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moniz v. National Constructors, Inc.
201 Misc. 393 (New York Supreme Court, 1952)
Engberman v. North German Lloyd Steamship Co.
84 N.Y.S. 199 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)
Roberson v. Rochester Folding Box Co.
68 A.D. 528 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902)
Jacob Hoffman Brewing Co. v. Volpe
4 Misc. 260 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 N.Y.S. 535, 22 Abb. N. Cas. 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wessels-v-carr-nynyccityct-1889.