Wess v. Revell
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-11148 Summary Calendar __________________
VICTOR WESS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
DR. REVELL, Dr.; S.O. GUNTER; COOLBERLEE, Dr.; MYRICK, RN; FITZGERALD, RN,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:95-CV-163 - - - - - - - - - - June 10, 1996
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Regardless whether the plaintiff's "Objections to Magistrate
Judge's Report and Recommendation" are construed as a FED. R. CIV.
P. 59 motion or a motion to amend the complaint, the plaintiff
has failed to allege a violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and the
magistrate judge did not abuse his discretion by dismissing the
suit. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c); Macias v. Raul A. (Unknown), Badge
No. 153, 23 F.3d 94, 97 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 220
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-11148 -2-
(1994); Simon v. United States, 891 F.2d 1154, 1159 (5th Cir.
1990); Pan-Islamic Trade Corp. v. Exxon Corp., 632 F.2d 539, 546
(5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 927 (1981).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wess v. Revell (Wess v. Revell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.