Weslie Martin v. The State of Nevada, et al.

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedOctober 17, 2025
Docket3:21-cv-00365
StatusUnknown

This text of Weslie Martin v. The State of Nevada, et al. (Weslie Martin v. The State of Nevada, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weslie Martin v. The State of Nevada, et al., (D. Nev. 2025).

Opinion

Attorney General 2 JAMIE S. HENDRICKSON (Bar No. 12770) Senior Deputy Attorney General 3 State of Nevada Office of the Attorney General 4 100 N. Carson Street Carson City, Nevada 89701-4717 5 (775) 684-1234 (phone) (775) 684-1108 (fax) 6 Email: jhendrickson@ag.nv.gov 7 Attorneys for Defendants William Reubart and Daniel Wheeler 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 WESLIE MARTIN, Case No. 3:21-cv-00365-ART-CSD 12 Plaintiff, STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY 13 v. AGREEMENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 14 THE STATE OF NEVADA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 The parties to this proposed Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective 17 (Order) Order have agreed to the terms of this Order; accordingly, it is ORDERED: 18 1. Scope. All materials produced or adduced from the parties or non-parties in 19 the course of discovery, including initial disclosures, responses to discovery requests, 20 responses to subpoenas, deposition testimony and exhibits, and information derived 21 directly therefrom (hereinafter collectively “documents”), shall be subject to this Order 22 concerning Confidential Information as defined below. This Order is subject to the local 23 rules of this Court and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on matters of procedure and 24 the calculation of time periods. 25 2. Confidential Information. As used in this Order, “Confidential 26 Information” means information designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” by the producing party, 27 after the entry of this Order. Information designed as “Confidential Information” by the 28 producing party must be information that the producing party believes, in good faith, would 2 without limitation, confidential information, private financial information, private medical 3 information, personal identification or employment records. 4 3. Designation 5 (a) A party may designate a document as Confidential Information for 6 protection under this Order by placing or affixing the words “CONFIDENTIAL” on the 7 document and on all copies in a manner that will not interfere with the legibility of the 8 document. As used in this Order, “copies” includes electronic images, duplicates, extracts, 9 summaries, or descriptions that contain the Confidential Information. The marking 10 “CONFIDENTIAL” shall be applied prior to or at the time of the documents are produced 11 or disclosed. Applying the marking “CONFIDENTIAL” to a document does not mean that 12 the document has any status or protection by statute or otherwise except to the extent and 13 for the purposes of this Order. Any copies that are made of any documents marked 14 “CONFIDENTIAL” shall also be so marked. 15 (b) Limited Third-Party Disclosures of Information Marked 16 “CONFIDENTIAL.” The parties and counsel for the parties shall not disclose or permit 17 the disclosure of any Confidential Information marked “CONFIDENTIAL” to any third 18 person or entity except as set forth below in subparagraphs (1)-(9). Subject to these 19 requirements, the following categories of persons may be allowed to review Information 20 marked “CONFIDENTIAL”: 21 (1) Counsel. Counsel for the parties and employees of counsel who 22 have responsibility for the action; 23 (2) Parties. Individual parties and employees of a party but only to 24 the extent receiving counsel determines in good faith that the 25 employee’s assistance is reasonably necessary to the conduct of 26 the litigation in which the information is disclosed; 27 (3) The Court and its personnel; 28 /// 2 recorders engaged for depositions; 3 (5) Contractors. Those persons specifically engaged for the limited 4 purpose of making copies of documents or organizing or 5 processing documents, including outside vendors hired to process 6 electronically stored documents; 7 (6) Consultants and Experts. Consultants, investigators, or 8 experts employed by the parties or counsel for the parties to 9 assist in the preparation and trial of this action but only after 10 such persons have completed the certification contained in 11 Attachment A, Acknowledgment of Understanding and 12 Agreement to Be Bound; 13 (7) Witnesses at depositions. During their depositions, witnesses 14 in this action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary. 15 Witnesses shall not retain a copy of documents containing 16 Confidential Information, except witnesses may receive a copy of 17 all exhibits marked at their depositions in connection with 18 review of the transcripts. Pages of transcribed deposition 19 testimony or exhibits to depositions that are designated as 20 Confidential Information pursuant to the process set out in this 21 Order must be separately bound by the court reporter and may 22 not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this Order. 23 (8) Author or recipient. The author or recipient of the document 24 (not including a person who received the document in the course 25 of litigation); and 26 (9) Others by Consent. Other persons only by written consent of 27 the producing party or upon order of the Court and on such 28 conditions as may be agreed or ordered. 2 this Protective Order shall not be used for any litigation other than the matter in which it 3 is produced. Its confidentiality shall be maintained in a manner such that Plaintiff and/or 4 any other attorney cannot use it in any of Plaintiff’s current or future litigation, it can only 5 be used in connection with 3:21-cv-00365-ART-CSD. It shall not be shared with any other 6 counsel than the parties to the Stipulation and Protective Order. 7 (d) Control of Documents. Counsel for the parties shall make reasonable 8 efforts to prevent unauthorized or inadvertent disclosure of Confidential Information. 9 Counsel shall maintain the originals of the forms signed by persons acknowledging their 10 obligations under this Order for a period of three years after the termination of the case. 11 5. Inadvertent Failure to Designate. An inadvertent failure to designate a 12 document as Confidential Information does not, standing alone, waive the right to so 13 designate the document. If a party designates a document as Confidential Information after 14 it was initially produced, the receiving party, on notification of the designation, must make 15 a reasonable effort to assure that the document is treated in accordance with the provisions 16 of this Order. No party shall be found to have violated this Order for failing to maintain 17 the confidentiality of material during a time when that material has not been designated 18 Confidential Information, even where the failure to so designate was inadvertent and 19 where the material is subsequently designated Confidential Information. 20 If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed 21 Confidential Information to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this 22 Stipulated Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing 23 the Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all 24 copies of the Confidential Information, (c) inform the person or persons to whom 25 unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this Order, and (d) request such 26 person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound by 27 Stipulated Protective Order” (Exhibit A). 28 /// 2 authorize the filing of any document under seal. Any party wishing to file a document 3 designated as Confidential Information in connection with a motion, brief or other 4 submission to the Court must comply with Local Rule IA 10-5 of the Local Rules of Practice 5 for the United States District Court, District of Nevada.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Lowell M. Birrell
447 F.2d 1168 (Second Circuit, 1971)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Weslie Martin v. The State of Nevada, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weslie-martin-v-the-state-of-nevada-et-al-nvd-2025.