Wesley v. Wilkerson
This text of 2015 Ark. 53 (Wesley v. Wilkerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2015 Ark. 53
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-14-615
EUGENE WESLEY Opinion Delivered February 19, 2015 APPELLANT PRO SE APPEAL FROM THE LEE V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 39CV-13-20]
MARY ANN WILKINSON AND DIANE HONORABLE L.T. SIMES, JUDGE HART, LEE COUNTY CIRCUIT CLERK’S OFFICE AFFIRMED. APPELLEES
PER CURIAM
On February 11, 2013, appellant Eugene Wesley filed a civil rights complaint against the
Lee County Circuit Court clerk and a deputy clerk, seeking declaratory judgment and money
damages. He subsequently filed a motion for the defendants to produce certain documents and
a motion for default judgment.
On March 25, 2014, the circuit court dismissed the complaint without prejudice on the
ground that no summons had been issued or served in the matter as required by Arkansas Rule
of Civil Procedure 4(i) (2014). The motions were declared moot. Appellant brings this appeal
from the order.
Rule 4(i) provides that, if service of the summons and a copy of the complaint is not
made upon a defendant within 120 days after the filing of the complaint or within the period of
time allowed by an extension, the action shall be dismissed without prejudice. This court has
held that statutory service requirements, being in derogation of common-law rights, must be
strictly construed and that compliance with them must be exact. Trusclair v. McGowan Working Cite as 2015 Ark. 53
Partners, 2009 Ark. 203, at 3, 306 S.W.3d 428, 430 (citing Smith v. Sidney Moncrief Pontiac, Buick,
GMC Co., 353 Ark. 701, 120 S.W.3d 525 (2003)).
Appellant argues that he served a copy of the complaint on the defendants, but the
record in this appeal does not reflect that summonses were ever issued or served in this matter.
Accordingly, based on the record before us, we cannot say that the circuit court erred in
dismissing the complaint without prejudice.
Affirmed.
Eugene Wesley, pro se appellant.
No response.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2015 Ark. 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wesley-v-wilkerson-ark-2015.