Wesley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wesley v. State

762 So. 2d 599, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9915, 2000 WL 1061984

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wesley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10373 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 4, 2000·No. No. 5D00-527·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. However, the cause is remanded to the trial court for correction of a scrivener’s error. In open court, the trial court orally withheld adjudication, but in the written judgment, the box for “adjudicated guilty” was checked off. Therefore, we remand for correction of the scrivener’s error in the written judgment.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; REMANDED.

W. SHARP, PETERSON and PLEUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. However, the cause is remanded to the trial court for correction of a scrivener’s error. In open court, the trial court orally withheld adjudication, but in the written judgment, the box for “adjudicated guilty” was checked off. Therefore, we remand for correction of the scrivener’s error in the written judgment.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; REMANDED.

W. SHARP, PETERSON and PLEUS, JJ., concur.

Wesley v. State, 762 So. 2d 599, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9915, 2000 WL 1061984 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

762 So. 2d 599 (Wesley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.