Wesley v. State

282 So. 2d 652
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 18, 1973·No. No. T-278·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of the Order denying his post-conviction motion to vacate judgment and sentence. This Court has previously affirmed his judgment of conviction and sentence for the offense of rape. Wesley v. State, 239 So.2d 124 (Fla.App.1st, 1970).

We have given full consideration to the record and briefs of the parties. It appearing therefrom that appellant has failed to demonstrate that prejudicial error was committed in the proceedings below, the Order appealed herein is AFFIRMED.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wesley v. State, 282 So. 2d 652 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

282 So. 2d 652 (Wesley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bryant v. Cole
282 So. 2d 652 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)