Wesley v. Biays

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maryland

Wesley v. Biays

29 F. Cas. 709

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maryland·Decided July 1, 1812·Published

Opinion

Libel for wages. The vessel was captured and sent in for adjudication. The master offered to discharge the seamen and find passages home for them, but they refused to quit the ship. She was. condemned; but upon appeal the decree was reversed. The vessel then prosecuted her voyage and returned to Baltimore. The district judge decreed wages for the whole time, including the delay at the port, where the vessel was sent in for adjudication [case unreported], which sentence was affirmed by this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Libel for wages. The vessel was captured and sent in for adjudication. The master offered to discharge the seamen and find passages home for them, but they refused to quit the ship. She was. condemned; but upon appeal the decree was reversed. The vessel then prosecuted her voyage and returned to Baltimore. The district judge decreed wages for the whole time, including the delay at the port, where the vessel was sent in for adjudication [case unreported], which sentence was affirmed by this court.

Wesley v. Biays, 29 F. Cas. 709 (circtdmd 1812).

Pincite

29 F. Cas. 709 (Wesley v. Biays) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.