Wesley v. Biays

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maryland

Wesley v. Biays

29 F. Cas. 709

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maryland

DecidedJuly 1, 1812

StatusPublished

This text of 29 F. Cas. 709 (Wesley v. Biays) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wesley v. Biays, 29 F. Cas. 709 (circtdmd 1812).

Pincite

Opinion

Libel for wages. The vessel was captured and sent in for adjudication. The master offered to discharge the seamen and find passages home for them, but they refused to quit the ship. She was. condemned; but upon appeal the decree was reversed. The vessel then prosecuted her voyage and returned to Baltimore. The district judge decreed wages for the whole time, including the delay at the port, where the vessel was sent in for adjudication [case unreported], which sentence was affirmed by this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Libel for wages. The vessel was captured and sent in for adjudication. The master offered to discharge the seamen and find passages home for them, but they refused to quit the ship. She was. condemned; but upon appeal the decree was reversed. The vessel then prosecuted her voyage and returned to Baltimore. The district judge decreed wages for the whole time, including the delay at the port, where the vessel was sent in for adjudication [case unreported], which sentence was affirmed by this court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 F. Cas. 709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wesley-v-biays-circtdmd-1812.