Wesley Harris, Jr. v. John E. Potter
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-10179 October 25, 2005 ________________________ THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 03-00640 CV-AR-S
WESLEY HARRIS, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
JOHN E. POTTER Postmaster General,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
(October 25, 2005)
Before ANDERSON, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
After oral argument and careful consideration, we affirm. We affirm the judgment of the district court with respect to plaintiff’s disability claim, because
plaintiff failed to prove that he could perform the essential functions of the job, or that his health problems could be reasonably accommodated. See Jackson v. Veterans Administration, 22 F.3d 277 (11th Cir. 1994). We also affirm with respect to plaintiff’s age claim; there is little or no evidence of age discrimination and plaintiff’s alleged comparator is not similarly situated. Finally, we affirm the judgment of the district court with respect to plaintiff’s retaliation claim; plaintiff has failed to prove either causation or pretext to overcome the defendant’s legitimate business reason.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wesley Harris, Jr. v. John E. Potter (Wesley Harris, Jr. v. John E. Potter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.