Wesley Harris, Jr. v. John E. Potter
This text of Wesley Harris, Jr. v. John E. Potter (Wesley Harris, Jr. v. John E. Potter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 05-10179 October 25, 2005 ________________________ THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK D. C. Docket No. 03-00640 CV-AR-S
WESLEY HARRIS, JR.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
JOHN E. POTTER Postmaster General,
Defendant-Appellee.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _________________________
(October 25, 2005)
Before ANDERSON, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
After oral argument and careful consideration, we affirm. We affirm the
judgment of the district court with respect to plaintiff’s disability claim, because plaintiff failed to prove that he could perform the essential functions of the job, or
that his health problems could be reasonably accommodated. See Jackson v.
Veterans Administration, 22 F.3d 277 (11th Cir. 1994). We also affirm with respect
to plaintiff’s age claim; there is little or no evidence of age discrimination and
plaintiff’s alleged comparator is not similarly situated. Finally, we affirm the
judgment of the district court with respect to plaintiff’s retaliation claim; plaintiff
has failed to prove either causation or pretext to overcome the defendant’s
legitimate business reason.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wesley Harris, Jr. v. John E. Potter, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wesley-harris-jr-v-john-e-potter-ca11-2005.