Wesley Edward MacHac v. State
This text of Wesley Edward MacHac v. State (Wesley Edward MacHac v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Wesley Edward Machac perfected an appeal from his conviction for driving while intoxicated. The clerk's fee has not been paid, and the clerk's record has not been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a). The Court notified appellant's retained attorney that the appeal would be dismissed if payment was not made. The Court received no response to this notice, and payment has not been made. The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
_________________________________________
Jan P. Patterson, Justice
Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Henson
Dismissed for Want of Prosecution
Filed: March 9, 2010
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wesley Edward MacHac v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wesley-edward-machac-v-state-texapp-2010.