Wesley Chapel, Inc. v. Van Den Hende
252 N.E.2d 629, 25 N.Y.2d 930, 305 N.Y.S.2d 149, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1043
Opinion
In each of the above-entitled proceedings: Order modified to the extent that costs previously allowed against the appellants are stricken, and, as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. The village was justified in litigating the validity of the retroactivity of its Zoning Ordinance under Village Law (•§ 179, [933]*933subd. 2, par. [a]) inasmuch as that provision has not heretofore been construed. No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wesley Chapel, Inc. v. Van Den Hende, 252 N.E.2d 629, 25 N.Y.2d 930, 305 N.Y.S.2d 149, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1043 (N.Y. 1969).
252 N.E.2d 629 (Wesley Chapel, Inc. v. Van Den Hende) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
We're Associates Co. v. Commissioner of the Department of Planning & Development of Oyster Bay
185 A.D.2d 820 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Nassau Children's House, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Inc.
77 A.D.2d 898 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Duncan v. Savino
90 Misc. 2d 282 (New York Supreme Court, 1977)
Incorporated Village v. Guardian Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
87 Misc. 2d 344 (New York Supreme Court, 1976)